I've been asking if this is desirable, the state of affairs that must be. But - that is not the question I've been asking for the last hour. You are talking from experience when you say that "moderation" is necessary or the server will "fail".
Xiong: I pose this question to you: How many servers need to die due to being unmoderated before you are convinced the idea won't work?Īssume the server lacks things like land claim, areas, etc. I ask, Why do you think "moderation" is required, inherently? John, why is "moderation" necessary? I don't say, Why are you convinced that without moderation, the server will "fail". VanessaE: I came after that server went down. ShadowNinja: celeron55's server was unmoderated, as I recall, was it not? You need easy and unlimited protection, ala landclain. Xiong, yes, without protection there might as well not have server Jordach: I'd love to see Minetest actually render like that in realtime Why are you trying to convince me of this, Jordach? I have said, clearly, that we will take it as a given that spawn produces a continuous stream of annoying players. 0gb.us had a server that was mostly moderation free. No, it is not, because it has already been tried before.Ī moderation-free server CAN work, but it's very hard. Is it not possible to assume, purely for the sake of discussion, that such a thing might work? Then the serious discussion can take place about whether it might be desirable or not. This discussion is revolving entirely around what will work not what might be desirable.īecause greifers are like flies, if one appears, there are bound to be many more as a swarmīecause one griefer knows more, and so on You can if you want, no one's telling you not to.īut you will fail if you don't take some precautions.
0 kommentar(er)
